Knowledge Representation Using Predicate-Argument Structures with Nonclassical Quantifiers
نویسنده
چکیده
The paper aims at contributing to the problem of translating natural (ethnic) language into the framework of formal logic in a structure-preserving way. There are several problems with encoding knowledge in logic-derived formalisms. Among the most difficult are those connected with natural language quantifiers. Even for relatively simple natural language sentences there are readings hard to encode in the classical formal logic. The solution we propose is to expand the language of the classical first-order logic with a number of new quantifier symbols (corresponding to the natural language quantifiers possibly co-occurring in a sentence) with a nonclassical semantics/interpretation similar in a way to the Mostowski’s generalized quantifier, i.e. as a family of subsets of the Cartesian product of variable ranges. We claim that the logic-based formalism involving such nonclassical quantifiers may be considered a good knowledge representation tool closer to the natural language then the classical logic.
منابع مشابه
Partially Ordered Connectives and Sum11 on Finite Models
In this paper we take up the study of Henkin quantifiers with boolean variables [4] also known as partially ordered connectives [19]. We consider first-order formulae prefixed by partially ordered connectives, denoted D, on finite structures. We characterize D as a fragment of second-order existential logic Σ 1♥ whose formulae do not allow for existential variables being argument of predicate v...
متن کاملEvent, Property, and Hierarchy in Order-Sorted Logic
Knowledge representation in logics, even in the order-sorted logic that includes a sort hierarchy, tends to lose the conciseness and the nuances of natural language. If we could construct a logic that includes both predicates and terms as classes in the hierarchies, it would be very useful for connecting general knowledge to specic knowledge. Although there are actually logics that are equipped...
متن کاملThree-Level Knowledge Representation of Predicate-Argument Mapping for Multilingual Lexicons
Constructing a semantic concept hierarchy covers only part of the problem in building any knowledgebased natural language processing (NLP) system: Language understanding requires mapping from syntactic structures into conceptual (i.e. interlingua) representation (henceforth verb-argument mapping), while language generation requires the inverse mapping. Jacobs [13] proposed a solution in which h...
متن کاملAcquiring Predicate-Argument Mapping Information From Multilingual Texts
This paper discusses automatic acquisition of predicate-argument mapping information from multilingual texts. The lexicon of our NLP system abstracts the language-dependent portion of predicate-argument mapping information from the core meaning of verb senses (i.e. semantic concepts as defined in the knowledge base). We represent this mapping information in terms of cross-linguistically general...
متن کاملQuantification, Aspect and Lexicon
1 1 1 1 I I I In n n nt t t tr r r ro o o od d d du u u uc c c ct t t ti i i io o o on n n n Languages differ in the variety of quantificational structures they employ (cf. Bach et al. (eds.), 1995) and in the extent to which the surface form of various quantificational structures provides us with explicit clues about semantic interpretation. The semantic structure of sentences with a single qu...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005